
Core i5-12500E

Core i9-9820X
Core i5-12500E vs Core i9-9820X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12500E vs Core i9-9820X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12500E vs Core i9-9820X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12500E
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $664 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 294.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.7 vs 23.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,615 vs 9,361).
Core i9-9820X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+8.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12500E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 90.7 PassMark/$ ($889 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12500E better than Core i9-9820X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12500E vs Core i9-9820X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500E
The Core i5-12500E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,411 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i9-9820X
The Core i9-9820X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,456 points. Launch price was $898.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-9820X offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-9820X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-12500E versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i9-9820X — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500E (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12500E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-9820X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500E scores 20,411 against the Core i9-9820X's 20,456 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i9-9820X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,168 vs 1,394, a 43.5% lead for the Core i5-12500E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,615 vs 9,361 (8.3% advantage for the Core i9-9820X). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500E vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-9820X.
| Feature | Core i5-12500E | Core i9-9820X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+7% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+9% | 16.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 20,411 | 20,456 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,528 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,168+56% | 1,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,615 | 9,361+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-9820X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-12500E versus DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i9-9820X — the Core i5-12500E supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12500E) vs 4 (Core i9-9820X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12500E) vs 44 (Core i9-9820X) — the Core i9-9820X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 600-series,W680 (Core i5-12500E) and Intel X299 (Core i9-9820X).
| Feature | Core i5-12500E | Core i9-9820X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+80% | DDR4 2666 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 44+120% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-9820X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-9820X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500E) vs true (Core i9-9820X). The Core i5-12500E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i9-9820X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500E targets Workstation, Core i9-9820X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500E rivals EPYC 7413.
| Feature | Core i5-12500E | Core i9-9820X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Workstation | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12500E was priced at $225, while the Core i9-9820X came in at $889. On launch pricing ($225 vs $889), Core i5-12500E was $664 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12500E delivers 90.7 pts/$ vs 23.0 pts/$ for the Core i9-9820X — making the Core i5-12500E the 119.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12500E | Core i9-9820X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-75% | $889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.7+294% | 23.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















