
Core i5-12500E

Xeon Gold 6138T
Core i5-12500E vs Xeon Gold 6138T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12500E vs Xeon Gold 6138T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12500E vs Xeon Gold 6138T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12500E
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,517 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $2,742 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1122.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.7 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $2,742 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,615 vs 11,988).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138T, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6138T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+39.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+52.8% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12500E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 90.7 PassMark/$ ($2,742 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12500E better than Xeon Gold 6138T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12500E vs Xeon Gold 6138T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500E
The Core i5-12500E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,411 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6138T
The Xeon Gold 6138T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,356 points. Launch price was $2,742.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138T has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-12500E versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138T — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500E (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12500E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500E scores 20,411 against the Xeon Gold 6138T's 20,356 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-12500E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,168 vs 1,030, a 71.2% lead for the Core i5-12500E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,615 vs 11,988 (32.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138T). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500E vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138T.
| Feature | Core i5-12500E | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 20 / 40+233% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+22% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 27.5 MB+53% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1500% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 20,411 | 20,356 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,528 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,168+110% | 1,030 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,615 | 11,988+39% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-12500E versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6138T — the Core i5-12500E supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6138T supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12500E) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6138T). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12500E) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6138T) — the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 600-series,W680 (Core i5-12500E) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6138T).
| Feature | Core i5-12500E | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+80% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon Gold 6138T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500E) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 6138T). The Core i5-12500E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6138T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500E targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500E rivals EPYC 7413.
| Feature | Core i5-12500E | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12500E was priced at $225, while the Xeon Gold 6138T came in at $2742. On launch pricing ($225 vs $2742), Core i5-12500E was $2517 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12500E delivers 90.7 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6138T — making the Core i5-12500E the 169.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12500E | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-92% | $2742 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.7+1126% | 7.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















