
Core i5-1335U

Core i5-10600KF
Core i5-1335U vs Core i5-10600KF Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1335U vs Core i5-10600KF FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-1335U vs Core i5-10600KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1335U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core i5-10600KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,093 vs 14,140).
Core i5-10600KF
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Core i5-1335U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-1335U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1335U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10600KF better than Core i5-1335U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1335U vs Core i5-10600KF Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1335U
The Core i5-1335U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,093 points. Launch price was $340.

Core i5-10600KF
The Core i5-10600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,140 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1335U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-10600KF offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-1335U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-1335U versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600KF — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10600KF (base: 1.3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i5-1335U uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-10600KF uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1335U scores 14,093 against the Core i5-10600KF's 14,140 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-10600KF. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-1335U | Core i5-10600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+215% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,093 | 14,140 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,977 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,389 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,456 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1335U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10600KF uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-6400 on the Core i5-1335U versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10600KF — the Core i5-1335U supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10600KF supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-1335U) vs 16 (Core i5-10600KF) — the Core i5-1335U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-1335U | Core i5-10600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400+140% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 128 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-10600KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1335U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10600KF). The Core i5-1335U includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Core i5-10600KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1335U targets Productivity, Core i5-10600KF targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-1335U rivals Ryzen 5 7535U.
| Feature | Core i5-1335U | Core i5-10600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Productivity | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













