Core i3-13100 vs Core i5-1335U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100 vs Core i5-1335U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100 vs Core i5-1335U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1335U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,064 vs 14,093).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Core i5-1335U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1335U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-1335U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core i3-13100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1335U better than Core i3-13100?

Yes. Core i5-1335U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 26.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-1335U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 26.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1335U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1335U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-13100 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-1335U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-13100 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (105.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1335U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-13100 vs Core i5-1335U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100

The Core i3-13100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,064 points. Launch price was $134.

Core i5-1335U

The Core i5-1335U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,093 points. Launch price was $340.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-1335U offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-1335U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-1335U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-1335U (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i3-13100 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-1335U uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100 scores 14,064 against the Core i5-1335U's 14,093 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-1335U. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-13100	Core i5-1335U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 12+150%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.6 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+162%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-U (2023)
PassMark	14,064	14,093
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,977
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,389
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,456

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-1335U uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-13100	Core i5-1335U
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	—	96 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-13100) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1335U). The Core i5-1335U includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Core i3-13100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1335U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-1335U rivals Ryzen 5 7535U.