
Core i3-13100

Core i9-10900TE
Core i3-13100 vs Core i9-10900TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-13100 vs Core i9-10900TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-13100 vs Core i9-10900TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-13100
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $175 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.0 vs 45.8 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,064 vs 14,159).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 60W vs 35W.
Core i9-10900TE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 60W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.8 vs 105.0 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900TE better than Core i3-13100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-13100 vs Core i9-10900TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100
The Core i3-13100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,064 points. Launch price was $134.

Core i9-10900TE
The Core i9-10900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,159 points. Launch price was $488.
Processing Power
The Core i3-13100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-10900TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-10900TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-10900TE — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-13100 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10900TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100 scores 14,064 against the Core i9-10900TE's 14,159 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-10900TE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900TE.
| Feature | Core i3-13100 | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+89% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,064 | 14,159 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10900TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-13100 | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-13100 was priced at $134, while the Core i9-10900TE came in at $309. On launch pricing ($134 vs $309), Core i3-13100 was $175 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100 delivers 105.0 pts/$ vs 45.8 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900TE — making the Core i3-13100 the 78.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-13100 | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134-57% | $309 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.0+129% | 45.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














