Core i3-13100 vs Ryzen 5 4600H

Core i3-13100 vs Ryzen 5 4600H Performance Spectrum

Core i3-13100

4 / 8

14,064

0.0%

14,173

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100 vs Ryzen 5 4600H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100 vs Ryzen 5 4600H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100

2023

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,064 vs 14,173).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 60W vs 45W.

Ryzen 5 4600H

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 60W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-13100 better than Ryzen 5 4600H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-13100 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600H pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i3-13100 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-13100 is the better buy right now. Core i3-13100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 4600H is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (105.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-13100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6, and 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-13100 vs Ryzen 5 4600H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100

The Core i3-13100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,064 points. Launch price was $134.

Ryzen 5 4600H

The Ryzen 5 4600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,173 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 4600H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600H — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-13100 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100 scores 14,064 against the Ryzen 5 4600H's 14,173 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600H.

Feature	Core i3-13100	Ryzen 5 4600H
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+13%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	14,064	14,173

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.