PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+16.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 83.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900HX across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5900HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 5900HX

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 8, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,955 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 9 5900HX

2021

Why buy it

✅+16.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 83.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 8, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900HX across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5900HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,955 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 9 5900HX?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 9 5900HX is ahead with a 16.6% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 16.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13400F also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 16.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $266 MSRP, and it gives you 16.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 9 5900HX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 16.6% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 53.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 83.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 5900HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 5900HX
1080p
low	171 FPS	189 FPS
medium	158 FPS	156 FPS
high	132 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	160 FPS
medium	123 FPS	129 FPS
high	99 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	88 FPS
medium	74 FPS	77 FPS
high	59 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	47 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 9 5900HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 5900HX
1080p
low	545 FPS	555 FPS
medium	464 FPS	466 FPS
high	389 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	343 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	497 FPS
medium	403 FPS	417 FPS
high	345 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	301 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	342 FPS
medium	247 FPS	295 FPS
high	231 FPS	269 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	232 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 9 5900HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 5900HX
1080p
low	530 FPS	555 FPS
medium	449 FPS	555 FPS
high	415 FPS	555 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	555 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	555 FPS
medium	422 FPS	546 FPS
high	382 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	431 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	477 FPS
medium	331 FPS	404 FPS
high	296 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	288 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 9 5900HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 5900HX
1080p
low	626 FPS	555 FPS
medium	626 FPS	555 FPS
high	626 FPS	555 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	555 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	555 FPS
medium	626 FPS	555 FPS
high	598 FPS	555 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	488 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	528 FPS
medium	492 FPS	476 FPS
high	439 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	353 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 9 5900HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 9 5900HX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 9 5900HX

The Ryzen 9 5900HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,198 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900HX uses Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 9 5900HX's 22,198 — a 12% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 13,955 (15% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,845, a 26.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 7,587 (40.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5900HX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 5900HX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark	25,029+13%	22,198
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+16%	13,955
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+30%	1,845
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+50%	7,587

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900HX uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 on the Ryzen 9 5900HX — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Ryzen 9 5900HX) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and FP6 (Ryzen 9 5900HX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 5900HX
Socket	LGA1700	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+200%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900HX). The Ryzen 9 5900HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 8), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 9 5900HX targets Gaming Laptop / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 9 5900HX rivals Core i9-11980HK.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 9 5900HX
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon RX Vega 8
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Gaming Laptop / Mobile Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900HX debuted at $266. On MSRP ($196 vs $266), the Core i5-13400F is $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 83.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900HX — making the Core i5-13400F the 41.9% better value option.