PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,249 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
✅Delivers 419.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 5416S.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5416S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 35,515).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5416S, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 5416S

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon Gold 5416S

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,249 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
✅Delivers 419.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 5416S.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5416S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 35,515).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5416S, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5416S better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 5416S makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5416S is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5416S is the better fit. You are getting 41.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5416S is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Gold 5416S is 637.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,445 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 419.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5416S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 5416S Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 5416S
1080p
low	171 FPS	186 FPS
medium	158 FPS	153 FPS
high	132 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	146 FPS
medium	123 FPS	115 FPS
high	99 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	68 FPS
medium	74 FPS	57 FPS
high	59 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Gold 5416S

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 5416S
1080p
low	545 FPS	244 FPS
medium	464 FPS	214 FPS
high	389 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	206 FPS
medium	403 FPS	187 FPS
high	345 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	133 FPS
medium	247 FPS	122 FPS
high	231 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	93 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Gold 5416S

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 5416S
1080p
low	530 FPS	888 FPS
medium	449 FPS	888 FPS
high	415 FPS	888 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	835 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	855 FPS
medium	422 FPS	755 FPS
high	382 FPS	702 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	628 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	546 FPS
medium	331 FPS	447 FPS
high	296 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	317 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Gold 5416S

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 5416S
1080p
low	626 FPS	888 FPS
medium	626 FPS	805 FPS
high	626 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	600 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	711 FPS
medium	626 FPS	621 FPS
high	598 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	494 FPS
medium	492 FPS	441 FPS
high	439 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	338 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Gold 5416S

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 5416S

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Gold 5416S

The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 5416S has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5416S uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Gold 5416S's 35,515 — a 34.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5416S. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 5416S
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+15%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029	35,515+42%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5416S uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S — the Xeon Gold 5416S supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 5416S
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	4400+87900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	80+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 5416S supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 5416S
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5416S debuted at $1445. On MSRP ($196 vs $1445), the Core i5-13400F is $1249 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5416S — making the Core i5-13400F the 135.4% better value option.