PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +66.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
✅Delivers 166.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-1250

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,671 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($285 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon W-1250

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +66.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
✅Delivers 166.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,671 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($285 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon W-1250?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1250 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 66.8% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 83.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $89 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $285 MSRP, and it gives you a 66.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 166.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 48.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-1250 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1250
1080p
low	171 FPS	186 FPS
medium	158 FPS	150 FPS
high	132 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	151 FPS
medium	123 FPS	119 FPS
high	99 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	84 FPS
medium	74 FPS	72 FPS
high	59 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1250

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1250
1080p
low	545 FPS	336 FPS
medium	464 FPS	273 FPS
high	389 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	214 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	302 FPS
medium	403 FPS	247 FPS
high	345 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	196 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	252 FPS
medium	247 FPS	208 FPS
high	231 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	161 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1250

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1250
1080p
low	530 FPS	342 FPS
medium	449 FPS	342 FPS
high	415 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	342 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	342 FPS
medium	422 FPS	342 FPS
high	382 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	342 FPS
medium	331 FPS	342 FPS
high	296 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	295 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1250

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1250
1080p
low	626 FPS	342 FPS
medium	626 FPS	342 FPS
high	626 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	342 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	342 FPS
medium	626 FPS	342 FPS
high	598 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	342 FPS
medium	492 FPS	342 FPS
high	439 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	342 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1250

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon W-1250

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon W-1250

The Xeon W-1250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,671 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1250 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-1250 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1250 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-1250's 13,671 — a 58.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1250.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1250
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.7 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+67%	12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	25,029+83%	13,671
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1250 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1250
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon W-1250). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1250
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1250 debuted at $285. On MSRP ($196 vs $285), the Core i5-13400F is $89 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 48.0 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1250 — making the Core i5-13400F the 90.8% better value option.