Core i5-1345U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1345U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1345U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1345U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,226 vs 14,267).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2697 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1345U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i5-1345U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1345U better than Xeon E5-2697 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2697 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1345U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2697 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1345U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1345U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1345U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-1345U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1345U

The Core i5-1345U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,226 points. Launch price was $309.

Xeon E5-2697 v2

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 14,267 points. Launch price was $1,723.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1345U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-1345U versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v2 — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-1345U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-1345U uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1345U scores 14,226 against the Xeon E5-2697 v2's 14,267 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2697 v2. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1345U vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v2.

Feature	Core i5-1345U	Xeon E5-2697 v2
Cores / Threads	10 / 12	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+34%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.7 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U (2023)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	14,226	14,267

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1345U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1345U	Xeon E5-2697 v2
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40