
Core i5-13490F

M2 Max
Core i5-13490F vs M2 Max Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13490F vs M2 Max FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13490F vs M2 Max: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13490F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike M2 Max.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,670 vs 26,824).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $235 MSRP, while M2 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M2 Max can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M2 Max
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Max GPU, while Core i5-13490F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13490F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13490F.
Quick Answers
So, is M2 Max better than Core i5-13490F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13490F vs M2 Max Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13490F
The Core i5-13490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,670 points. Launch price was $235.
M2 Max
The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the M2 Max has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13490F versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13490F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core i5-13490F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13490F scores 26,670 against the M2 Max's 26,824 — a 0.6% lead for the M2 Max. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13490F vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 12+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+3% | 2.424 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 48 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 36 MB+2780% |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | — |
| PassMark | 26,670 | 26,824 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,844 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13490F versus LPDDR5-6400 on the M2 Max — the M2 Max supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13490F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13490F) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13490F) vs 0 (M2 Max) — the Core i5-13490F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | LPDDR5-6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+100% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13490F) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). The M2 Max includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Max GPU), while the Core i5-13490F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13490F targets Gaming, M2 Max targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Apple M2 Max GPU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Virtualization |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














