
Core i5-13490F

Xeon w3-2435
Core i5-13490F vs Xeon w3-2435 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13490F vs Xeon w3-2435 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13490F vs Xeon w3-2435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13490F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $434 less on MSRP ($235 MSRP vs $669 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 186.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 113.5 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($235 MSRP vs $669 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Xeon w3-2435.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon w3-2435
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,504 vs 26,670).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 113.5 PassMark/$ ($669 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13490F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13490F better than Xeon w3-2435?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13490F vs Xeon w3-2435 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13490F
The Core i5-13490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,670 points. Launch price was $235.

Xeon w3-2435
The Xeon w3-2435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,504 points. Launch price was $669.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w3-2435 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13490F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13490F versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon w3-2435 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13490F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13490F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w3-2435 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13490F scores 26,670 against the Xeon w3-2435's 26,504 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-13490F. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13490F vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon w3-2435.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+7% | 22.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 26,670 | 26,504 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,844 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w3-2435 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13490F) / not specified (Xeon w3-2435). Primary use case: Core i5-13490F targets Gaming.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13490F was priced at $235, while the Xeon w3-2435 came in at $669. On launch pricing ($235 vs $669), Core i5-13490F was $434 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13490F delivers 113.5 pts/$ vs 39.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2435 — making the Core i5-13490F the 96.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13490F | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $235-65% | $669 |
| Performance per Dollar | 113.5+187% | 39.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















