Core i5-13490F vs Xeon D-2796TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13490F vs Xeon D-2796TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13490F vs Xeon D-2796TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13490F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 118W, a 53W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Xeon D-2796TE.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2796TE, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $235 MSRP, while Xeon D-2796TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-2796TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13490F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,342 vs 26,670).
❌81.5% higher power demand at 118W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Core i5-13490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13490F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13490F better than Xeon D-2796TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2796TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13490F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13490F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 23.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13490F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13490F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13490F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $235 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (113.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13490F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2579, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-13490F vs Xeon D-2796TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13490F

The Core i5-13490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,670 points. Launch price was $235.

Xeon D-2796TE

The Xeon D-2796TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 118 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,342 points. Launch price was $2,101.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2796TE offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2796TE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13490F versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2796TE — a 43% clock advantage for the Core i5-13490F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13490F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon D-2796TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13490F scores 26,670 against the Xeon D-2796TE's 26,342 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-13490F. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13490F vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2796TE.

Feature	Core i5-13490F	Xeon D-2796TE
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	20 / 40+100%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+55%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	26,670+1%	26,342
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,844	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2796TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13490F	Xeon D-2796TE
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—