Core i5-13500H vs Xeon E5-2673 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13500H vs Xeon E5-2673 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13500H vs Xeon E5-2673 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13500H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,080 vs 21,277).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+177.8% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13500H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13500H better than Xeon E5-2673 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2673 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13500H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2673 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 177.8% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13500H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-13500H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13500H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011-3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13500H vs Xeon E5-2673 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13500H

The Core i5-13500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,080 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,277 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13500H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-13500H versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 — a 68.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-13500H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500H scores 21,080 against the Xeon E5-2673 v4's 21,277 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2673 v4. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500H vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v4.

Feature	Core i5-13500H	Xeon E5-2673 v4
Cores / Threads	12 / 16	20 / 40+67%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+104%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	50 MB+178%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	5 MB+150%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	21,080	21,277
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,116	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13500H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13500H	Xeon E5-2673 v4
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCLGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13500H) / not specified (Xeon E5-2673 v4). The Core i5-13500H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13500H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13500H rivals Ryzen 7 7735HS.