
Core i5-13500T

Xeon E5-2698 v4
Core i5-13500T vs Xeon E5-2698 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13500T vs Xeon E5-2698 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13500T vs Xeon E5-2698 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13500T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E5-2698 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,622 vs 22,764).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 50 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2698 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $342 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2698 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2698 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-13500T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13500T better than Xeon E5-2698 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13500T vs Xeon E5-2698 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13500T
The Core i5-13500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,622 points. Launch price was $232.

Xeon E5-2698 v4
The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 22,764 points. Launch price was $3,226.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13500T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13500T versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500T (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-13500T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500T scores 22,622 against the Xeon E5-2698 v4's 22,764 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2698 v4. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500T vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2698 v4.
| Feature | Core i5-13500T | Xeon E5-2698 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 20 / 40+43% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 50 MB+108% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 5 MB+300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 22,622 | 22,764 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,028 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,278 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,900 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13500T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13500T | Xeon E5-2698 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13500T) / not specified (Xeon E5-2698 v4). The Core i5-13500T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13500T targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13500T rivals Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core i5-13500T | Xeon E5-2698 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













