
Core i5-14400F

Ryzen 9 5900X
Core i5-14400F vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14400F vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14400F vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14400F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $353 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 131.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,670 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 131.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Core i5-14400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14400F vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14400F
The Core i5-14400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,670 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-14400F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14400F scores 25,670 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 41.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core i5-14400F | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 64 MB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 25,670 | 38,955+52% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-14400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Core i5-14400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-14400F | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Core i5-14400F targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core i5-14400F | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-14400F was priced at $196, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($196 vs $549), Core i5-14400F was $353 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14400F delivers 131.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Core i5-14400F the 59.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14400F | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-64% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 131.0+85% | 71.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














