Core i5-14400T vs M4 (8 cores)

Intel

Core i5-14400T

10 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS

M4 (8 cores)

8 Cores8 Thrd4 WWMax: 4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-14400T

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 (8 cores) across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.

M4 (8 cores)

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (20,761 vs 20,911).

Quick Answers

So, is M4 (8 cores) better than Core i5-14400T?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, M4 (8 cores) is ahead with a 5.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14400T pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14400T is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
M4 (8 cores) still looks like the safer overall buy. M4 (8 cores) is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-14400T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M4 (8 cores) is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-14400TM4 (8 cores)
1080p
low170 FPS177 FPS
medium153 FPS141 FPS
high124 FPS115 FPS
ultra106 FPS91 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS145 FPS
medium125 FPS113 FPS
high100 FPS91 FPS
ultra85 FPS72 FPS
4K
low82 FPS67 FPS
medium76 FPS56 FPS
high60 FPS44 FPS
ultra46 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-14400TM4 (8 cores)
1080p
low306 FPS350 FPS
medium261 FPS297 FPS
high218 FPS253 FPS
ultra198 FPS205 FPS
1440p
low257 FPS301 FPS
medium227 FPS265 FPS
high195 FPS229 FPS
ultra169 FPS185 FPS
4K
low156 FPS213 FPS
medium140 FPS193 FPS
high131 FPS172 FPS
ultra116 FPS139 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-14400TM4 (8 cores)
1080p
low523 FPS519 FPS
medium517 FPS519 FPS
high476 FPS519 FPS
ultra418 FPS496 FPS
1440p
low523 FPS519 FPS
medium460 FPS495 FPS
high421 FPS446 FPS
ultra371 FPS386 FPS
4K
low432 FPS438 FPS
medium355 FPS347 FPS
high322 FPS301 FPS
ultra263 FPS240 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-14400TM4 (8 cores)
1080p
low523 FPS519 FPS
medium523 FPS519 FPS
high523 FPS519 FPS
ultra523 FPS519 FPS
1440p
low523 FPS519 FPS
medium523 FPS519 FPS
high523 FPS519 FPS
ultra476 FPS459 FPS
4K
low493 FPS480 FPS
medium452 FPS429 FPS
high401 FPS384 FPS
ultra350 FPS333 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14400T and M4 (8 cores)

Intel

Core i5-14400T

The Core i5-14400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,911 points. Launch price was $221.

M4 (8 cores)

The M4 (8 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 28 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 20,761 points. Launch price was $299.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i5-14400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the M4 (8 cores) offers 8 cores / 8 threads β€” the Core i5-14400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-14400T versus 4 GHz on the M4 (8 cores) β€” a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-14400T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.89 GHz). The Core i5-14400T is built on the Raptor Lake-R (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-14400T scores 20,911 against the M4 (8 cores)'s 20,761 β€” a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-14400T.

FeatureCore i5-14400TM4 (8 cores)
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+25%
8 / 8
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+13%
4 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.89 GHz+93%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
β€”
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
β€”
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023βˆ’2025)
β€”
PassMark
20,911
20,761
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-14400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 (8 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-14400TM4 (8 cores)
Socket
LGA1700
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0