PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-14600KF vs Core i7-13700F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-14600KF vs Core i7-13700F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-14600KF

2023

Why buy it

✅+8.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($304 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.2 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($304 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,700 vs 24,775).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Core i5-14600KF.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,676 vs 2,900).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 106.4 vs 127.2 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $304 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than Core i5-14600KF?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-14600KF is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F pulls ahead with 0.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-13700F also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-14600KF is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13700F comes in 18.1% more expensive on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $304 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Core i5-14600KF is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-14600KF is also 19.5% better value on MSRP (127.2 vs 106.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 14/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-14600KF vs Core i7-13700F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14600KF

The Core i5-14600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,664 points. Launch price was $294.

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-14600KF packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-13700F offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i5-14600KF versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-14600KF (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-14600KF uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14600KF scores 38,664 against the Core i7-13700F's 38,212 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-14600KF. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,700 vs 24,775 (0.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,900 vs 2,676, a 8% lead for the Core i5-14600KF that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,000 vs 14,254 (23.2% advantage for the Core i5-14600KF). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14600KF vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F.

Feature	Core i5-14600KF	Core i7-13700F
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 24+14%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+2%	5.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	38,664+1%	38,212
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,700	24,775
Geekbench 6 Single	2,900+8%	2,676
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,000+26%	14,254

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 700 Series,Intel 600 Series (Core i5-14600KF) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F).

Feature	Core i5-14600KF	Core i7-13700F
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-14600KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-14600KF) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F). Primary use case: Core i5-14600KF targets Desktop, Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X.

Feature	Core i5-14600KF	Core i7-13700F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Desktop	High-end Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-14600KF was priced at $304, while the Core i7-13700F came in at $359. On launch pricing ($304 vs $359), Core i5-14600KF was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14600KF delivers 127.2 pts/$ vs 106.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700F — making the Core i5-14600KF the 17.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-14600KF	Core i7-13700F
MSRP	$304-15%	$359
Performance per Dollar	127.2+20%	106.4
Release Date	2023	2023

Search Core i5-14600KF on Amazon

Search Core i7-13700F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.