
Core i5-14600KF

Xeon W-3335
Core i5-14600KF vs Xeon W-3335 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14600KF vs Xeon W-3335 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14600KF vs Xeon W-3335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14600KF
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,126 less on MSRP ($304 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 362.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.2 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($304 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,664 vs 39,293).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3335, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-3335
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 127.2 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $304 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-14600KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14600KF better than Xeon W-3335?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14600KF vs Xeon W-3335 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14600KF
The Core i5-14600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,664 points. Launch price was $294.

Xeon W-3335
The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14600KF packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i5-14600KF versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 28% clock advantage for the Core i5-14600KF (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-14600KF uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3335 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14600KF scores 38,664 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon W-3335. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-14600KF | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+32% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 38,664 | 39,293+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14600KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-14600KF versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the Core i5-14600KF supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3335 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-14600KF) vs 8 (Xeon W-3335). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14600KF) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon W-3335 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 700 Series,Intel 600 Series (Core i5-14600KF) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).
| Feature | Core i5-14600KF | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-14600KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3335 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-14600KF) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). Primary use case: Core i5-14600KF targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Core i5-14600KF | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-14600KF was priced at $304, while the Xeon W-3335 came in at $1430. On launch pricing ($304 vs $1430), Core i5-14600KF was $1126 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14600KF delivers 127.2 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3335 — making the Core i5-14600KF the 128.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14600KF | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $304-79% | $1430 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.2+363% | 27.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















