
Core i5-2300

Xeon W5580
Core i5-2300 vs Xeon W5580 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2300 vs Xeon W5580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2300 vs Xeon W5580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2300
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 2000, while Xeon W5580 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W5580.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W5580 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W5580, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $177 MSRP, while Xeon W5580 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W5580
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,459 vs 3,475).
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2300.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2300 better than Xeon W5580?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2300 vs Xeon W5580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2300
The Core i5-2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,475 points. Launch price was $168.

Xeon W5580
The Xeon W5580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,459 points. Launch price was $102.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W5580's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2300 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W5580 — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon W5580 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-2300 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W5580 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2300 scores 3,475 against the Xeon W5580's 3,459 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-2300. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2300 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W5580.
| Feature | Core i5-2300 | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.46 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Gainestown (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,475 | 3,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 516 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,515 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2300 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W5580 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-2300 | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-2300) / not specified (Xeon W5580). The Core i5-2300 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon W5580 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-2300 | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














