Core i5-2300
VS
Xeon X5698

Core i5-2300 vs Xeon X5698

Intel

Core i5-2300

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon X5698

2 Cores4 Thrd130 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2300 is positioned at rank 799 and the Xeon X5698 is on rank 659, so the Xeon X5698 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15880%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15005%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10895%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3282%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2600%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2274%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1303%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1286%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1171%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1170%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1157%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1126%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1110%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1106%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1096%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
100%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
100%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
100%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
100%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
99%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
99%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
99%
#807
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
99%
#808
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#809
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
99%
#812
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
98%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5698

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12055%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2276%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2022%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1562%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
99%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
99%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
98%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
98%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
98%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
98%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
97%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#659
Xeon X5698
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
98%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
97%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
97%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5698 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i5-2300Xeon X5698
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($17)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2300 ($17), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($17 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i5-2300Xeon X5698
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($17)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2300 and Xeon X5698

Intel

Core i5-2300

The Core i5-2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,475 points. Launch price was $168.

Intel

Xeon X5698

The Xeon X5698 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,447 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X5698 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2300 versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon X5698 — a 34.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5698 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i5-2300 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5698 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2300 scores 3,475 against the Xeon X5698's 3,447 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-2300. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2300 vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5698.

FeatureCore i5-2300Xeon X5698
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
4.4 GHz+42%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
4.4 GHz+57%
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
12288 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
3,475
3,447
Geekbench 6 Single
516
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,515
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2300 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5698 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-2300) vs 3 (Xeon X5698). Chipset compatibility: H61,P67,Z68,Z77 (Core i5-2300) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5698).

FeatureCore i5-2300Xeon X5698
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
3+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-2300) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5698). The Core i5-2300 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon X5698 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5698 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5698 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureCore i5-2300Xeon X5698
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation