Core i5-2380P vs PRO A10-9700

Core i5-2380P vs PRO A10-9700 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-2380P

4 / 4

3,636

+1.0%

3,600

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2380P vs PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2380P vs PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2380P

2012

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike PRO A10-9700.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-9700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $177 MSRP, while PRO A10-9700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

PRO A10-9700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,600 vs 3,636).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2380P.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-9700 better than Core i5-2380P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A10-9700 is ahead with a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2380P pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2380P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-9700 is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A10-9700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $177 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-2380P only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (20.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-9700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-2380P vs PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2380P

The Core i5-2380P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,636 points. Launch price was $180.

PRO A10-9700

The PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2380P and PRO A10-9700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2380P versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-9700 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the PRO A10-9700 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-2380P uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2380P scores 3,636 against the PRO A10-9700's 3,600 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-2380P.

Feature	Core i5-2380P	PRO A10-9700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,636+1%	3,600
Geekbench 6 Single	624	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2380P uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A10-9700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-2380P	PRO A10-9700
Socket	LGA1155	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-2380P) / not specified (PRO A10-9700). Primary use case: Core i5-2380P targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2380P rivals FX-4100.