
Core i5-2380P

Xeon W3580
Core i5-2380P vs Xeon W3580 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2380P vs Xeon W3580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2380P vs Xeon W3580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2380P
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $117 less on MSRP ($177 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($177 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W3580.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3580 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,636 vs 3,638).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3580, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon W3580
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $177 MSRP).
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2380P.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W3580 better than Core i5-2380P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2380P vs Xeon W3580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2380P
The Core i5-2380P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,636 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon W3580
The Xeon W3580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,638 points. Launch price was $215.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2380P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3580's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2380P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3580 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W3580 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i5-2380P uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3580 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2380P scores 3,636 against the Xeon W3580's 3,638 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W3580. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2380P vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3580.
| Feature | Core i5-2380P | Xeon W3580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.33 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,636 | 3,638 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 624 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2380P uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3580 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-2380P | Xeon W3580 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-2380P) / not specified (Xeon W3580). Primary use case: Core i5-2380P targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2380P rivals FX-4100.
| Feature | Core i5-2380P | Xeon W3580 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-2380P was priced at $177, while the Xeon W3580 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($177 vs $294), Core i5-2380P was $117 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2380P delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W3580 — making the Core i5-2380P the 49.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2380P | Xeon W3580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $177-40% | $294 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5+65% | 12.4 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














