
Core i5-2500

Core i5-2500K
Core i5-2500 vs Core i5-2500K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2500 vs Core i5-2500K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2500 vs Core i5-2500K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2500
2011Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (590 vs 684).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (2,642 vs 3,200).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 18.4 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
Core i5-2500K
2011Why buy it
- ✅+15.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.4 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2500K better than Core i5-2500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2500 vs Core i5-2500K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2500
The Core i5-2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,102 points. Launch price was $85.

Core i5-2500K
The Core i5-2500K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $216.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-2500 and Core i5-2500K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500K — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-2500 scores 4,102 against the Core i5-2500K's 4,141 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-2500K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 2,642 vs 3,200 (19.1% advantage for the Core i5-2500K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 590 vs 684, a 14.8% lead for the Core i5-2500K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,690 vs 2,032 (18.4% advantage for the Core i5-2500K). L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-2500K.
| Feature | Core i5-2500 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,102 | 4,141 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,642 | 3,200+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 590 | 684+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,690 | 2,032+20% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2500) and P67,Z68,Z77 (Core i5-2500K).
| Feature | Core i5-2500 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-2500K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2500) vs VT-x (Core i5-2500K). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2500) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2500K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500 targets Desktop, Core i5-2500K targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500K rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | Core i5-2500 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-2500 was priced at $294, while the Core i5-2500K came in at $225. On launch pricing ($294 vs $225), Core i5-2500K was $69 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2500 delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 18.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-2500K — making the Core i5-2500K the 27.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2500 | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $225-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 18.4+31% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














