Core i5-2500
VS
Core i7-7660U

Core i5-2500 vs Core i7-7660U

Intel

Core i5-2500

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-7660U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2500 is positioned at rank 922 and the Core i7-7660U is on rank 550, so the Core i7-7660U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22345%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21114%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15330%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4618%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3658%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3200%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1833%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1809%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1647%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1647%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1629%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1585%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1563%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1556%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1542%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
97%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
96%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
100%
#923
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
98%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
98%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
98%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
98%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
98%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
97%
#932
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
96%
#933
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
96%
#935
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
95%
#936
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#937
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7660U

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
99%
#538
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
723%
#539
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
712%
#540
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
654%
#541
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
651%
#542
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
645%
#544
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
623%
#545
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
597%
#546
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
596%
#547
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
580%
#550
Core i7-7660U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-7660U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-2500Core i7-7660U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2500 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-2500Core i7-7660U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2500 and Core i7-7660U

Intel

Core i5-2500

The Core i5-2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,102 points. Launch price was $85.

Intel

Core i7-7660U

The Core i7-7660U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,059 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-7660U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500 versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-7660U — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7660U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-2500 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-7660U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500 scores 4,102 against the Core i7-7660U's 4,059 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-2500. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 2,642 vs 1,759 (40.1% advantage for the Core i5-2500). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 590 vs 1,150, a 64.4% lead for the Core i7-7660U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,690 vs 2,285 (29.9% advantage for the Core i7-7660U). L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7660U.

FeatureCore i5-2500Core i7-7660U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4 GHz+8%
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+32%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)+50%
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,102+1%
4,059
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,642+50%
1,759
Geekbench 6 Single
590
1,150+95%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,690
2,285+35%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2500 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-7660U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2500 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-7660U — the Core i7-7660U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2500) vs 12 (Core i7-7660U) — the Core i5-2500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2500) and SoC (Core i7-7660U).

FeatureCore i5-2500Core i7-7660U
Socket
LGA1155
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2500) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7660U). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2500) and Iris Plus 640 (Core i7-7660U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500 targets Desktop, Core i7-7660U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-7660U rivals Core i5-8250U.

FeatureCore i5-2500Core i7-7660U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Iris Plus 640
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
Productivity