
Core i5-2500K

Core i5-10210Y
Core i5-2500K vs Core i5-10210Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2500K vs Core i5-10210Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2500K vs Core i5-10210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2500K
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-10210Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10210Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,032 vs 2,380).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core i5-10210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-10210Y
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2500K.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10210Y better than Core i5-2500K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2500K vs Core i5-10210Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2500K
The Core i5-2500K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $216.

Core i5-10210Y
The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2500K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i5-10210Y's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500K versus 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core i5-2500K uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-10210Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500K scores 4,141 against the Core i5-10210Y's 4,131 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-2500K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 684 vs 1,079, a 44.8% lead for the Core i5-10210Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,032 vs 2,380 (15.8% advantage for the Core i5-10210Y). Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-2500K | Core i5-10210Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+230% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Comet Lake-Y (2019) |
| PassMark | 4,141 | 4,131 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 684 | 1,079+58% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,032 | 2,380+17% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2500K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10210Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2500K versus LPDDR3 2133 MHz on the Core i5-10210Y — the Core i5-10210Y supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2500K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2500K) vs 10 (Core i5-10210Y) — the Core i5-2500K offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P67,Z68,Z77 (Core i5-2500K) and SoC (Core i5-10210Y).
| Feature | Core i5-2500K | Core i5-10210Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | UTFCBGA1377 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | LPDDR3 2133 MHz+60% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+60% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-2500K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i5-2500K) vs true (Core i5-10210Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2500K) and Intel UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-10210Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500K targets Gaming, Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500K rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | Core i5-2500K | Core i5-10210Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 3000 | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile Low Power |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














