Core i5-2500K vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

Core i5-2500K vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Performance Spectrum

Core i5-2500K

4 / 4

4,141

+0.4%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

8 / 8

4,125

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2500K vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2500K vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2500K

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while MediaTek Kompanio 1300T needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 1300T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,125 vs 4,141).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2500K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2500K.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2500K better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is ahead with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2500K pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2500K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2500K is the better buy right now. Core i5-2500K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-2500K vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2500K

The Core i5-2500K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $216.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

The MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 9 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. Built on 6 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-2500K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500K versus 2.6 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T — a 34.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-2500K (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-2500K uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500K scores 4,141 against the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T's 4,125 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-2500K.

Feature	Core i5-2500K	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+42%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm	6 nm-81%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	4,141	4,125
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,200	—
Geekbench 6 Single	684	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,032	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i5-2500K) / not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 1300T). The Core i5-2500K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500K targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500K rivals FX-6300.