Core i5-2500T vs Core i5-3360M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2500T vs Core i5-3360M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2500T vs Core i5-3360M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2500T

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Core i5-3360M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-3360M

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,892 vs 2,929).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2500T better than Core i5-3360M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-3360M is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2500T pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core i5-2500T also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2500T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2500T is the better buy right now. Core i5-2500T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $182 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-3360M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3360M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-2500T vs Core i5-3360M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2500T

The Core i5-2500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,929 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3360M

The Core i5-3360M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-2500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3360M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2500T versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3360M — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3360M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-2500T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3360M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500T scores 2,929 against the Core i5-3360M's 2,892 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-2500T. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3360M.

Feature	Core i5-2500T	Core i5-3360M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.8 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)+100%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,929+1%	2,892

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2500T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3360M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2500T versus 1600 on the Core i5-3360M — the Core i5-3360M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i5-2500T	Core i5-3360M
Socket	LGA1155	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2500T) vs true (Core i5-3360M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2500T) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3360M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3360M rivals AMD A10-4600M.