Core i5-2500T vs Xeon X3460
Core i5-2500T
Xeon X3460
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2500T is positioned at rank 882 and the Xeon X3460 is on rank 886, so the Core i5-2500T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500T
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3460
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-2500T | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-2500T | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+21%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2500T and Xeon X3460
Core i5-2500T
The Core i5-2500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,929 points. Launch price was $69.
Xeon X3460
The Xeon X3460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,955 points. Launch price was $316.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3460's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2500T versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X3460 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X3460 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-2500T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X3460 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500T scores 2,929 against the Xeon X3460's 2,955 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon X3460. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3460.
| Feature | Core i5-2500T | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.46 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,929 | 2,955 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2500T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X3460 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-2500T | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2500T) / not specified (Xeon X3460). The Core i5-2500T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon X3460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-2500T | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-2500T launched at $182 MSRP, while the Xeon X3460 debuted at $316. At current prices ($30 vs $25), the Xeon X3460 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2500T delivers 97.6 pts/$ vs 118.2 pts/$ for the Xeon X3460 — making the Xeon X3460 the 19.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2500T | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-42% | $316 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $25-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.6 | 118.2+21% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-2500T and Xeon X3460
