Core i5-2510E
VS
A6-3620

Core i5-2510E vs A6-3620

Intel

Core i5-2510E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A6-3620

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2510E is positioned at rank 1131 and the A6-3620 is on rank 580, so the A6-3620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2510E

#1119
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3582%
#1120
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3530%
#1121
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3241%
#1122
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3226%
#1123
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3196%
#1125
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3087%
#1126
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2960%
#1127
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2955%
#1128
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2875%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
93%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
93%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3620

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9965%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9416%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6837%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2060%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1631%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1427%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
817%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
807%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
735%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
735%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
726%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
707%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
697%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
694%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
688%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
98%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
97%
#580
A6-3620
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
99%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
99%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
99%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
99%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
99%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
98%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
98%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
97%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
96%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-2510E delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A6-3620 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-2510EA6-3620
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-2510EA6-3620
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2510E and A6-3620

Intel

Core i5-2510E

The Core i5-2510E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,884 points. Launch price was $266.

AMD

A6-3620

The A6-3620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2510E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A6-3620 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2510E versus 2.5 GHz on the A6-3620 — a 21.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-2510E (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-2510E uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-3620 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2510E scores 1,884 against the A6-3620's 1,877 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-2510E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 527 vs 300, a 54.9% lead for the Core i5-2510E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2510E vs 0 kB on the A6-3620.

FeatureCore i5-2510EA6-3620
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+24%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,884
1,877
Geekbench 6 Single
527+76%
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2510E uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-3620 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM67 (Core i5-2510E) and A55,A75 (A6-3620).

FeatureCore i5-2510EA6-3620
Socket
PGA988
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2510E) vs AMD-V (A6-3620). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2510E) and Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3620) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2510E targets Embedded, A6-3620 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2510E rivals Embedded R-Series; A6-3620 rivals Pentium G840.

FeatureCore i5-2510EA6-3620
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Radeon HD 6530D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Embedded
Budget Desktop