Core i5-2510E
VS
Celeron G3900T

Core i5-2510E vs Celeron G3900T

Intel

Core i5-2510E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron G3900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2510E is positioned at rank 1131 and the Celeron G3900T is on rank 451, so the Celeron G3900T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2510E

#1119
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3582%
#1120
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3530%
#1121
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3241%
#1122
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3226%
#1123
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3196%
#1125
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3087%
#1126
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2960%
#1127
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2955%
#1128
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2875%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
93%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
93%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6890%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6511%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4727%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1424%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1128%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
987%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
565%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
558%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
508%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
508%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
502%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
489%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
482%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
480%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
476%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
100%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
100%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
99%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
99%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
99%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
98%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
98%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
100%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
100%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
99%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
98%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2510E leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G3900T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-2510ECeleron G3900T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-2510E stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 57% cheaper ($30 vs $70) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-2510ECeleron G3900T
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+131%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2510E and Celeron G3900T

Intel

Core i5-2510E

The Core i5-2510E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,884 points. Launch price was $266.

Intel

Celeron G3900T

The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2510E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3900T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2510E versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T — a 17.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-2510E (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-2510E uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G3900T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2510E scores 1,884 against the Celeron G3900T's 1,900 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G3900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 527 vs 514, a 2.5% lead for the Core i5-2510E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2510E vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900T.

FeatureCore i5-2510ECeleron G3900T
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+19%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,884
1,900
Geekbench 6 Single
527+3%
514
Geekbench 6 Multi
903
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2510E uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3900T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2510E versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900T — the Celeron G3900T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM67 (Core i5-2510E) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900T).

FeatureCore i5-2510ECeleron G3900T
Socket
PGA988
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2510E) vs VT-x (Celeron G3900T). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2510E) and HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2510E targets Embedded, Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-2510E rivals Embedded R-Series; Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.

FeatureCore i5-2510ECeleron G3900T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Embedded
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-2510E launched at $230 MSRP, while the Celeron G3900T debuted at $42. At current prices ($30 vs $70), the Core i5-2510E is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2510E delivers 62.8 pts/$ vs 27.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G3900T — making the Core i5-2510E the 79.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-2510ECeleron G3900T
MSRP
$230
$42-82%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-57%
$70
Performance per Dollar
62.8+132%
27.1
Release Date
2011
2015