Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F

Intel

Core i5-2515E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2515E

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (1,882 vs 13,029).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +291.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-2515E.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i5-2515E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2515E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i5-2515E?
Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 291.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 592.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 291.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 592.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 291.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2011), 300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-2515E

The Core i5-2515E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,882 points. Launch price was $266.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i5-2515E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β€” the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core i5-2515E versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F β€” a 52.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-2515E uses the Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2515E scores 1,882 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 β€” a 149.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 530 vs 1,454, a 93.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2515E vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

FeatureCore i5-2515ECore i5-10400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
4.3 GHz+72%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011βˆ’2013)
Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025)
PassMark
1,882
13,029+592%
Cinebench R23 Multi
β€”
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
530
1,454+174%
Geekbench 6 Multi
β€”
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2515E uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2515E versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F β€” the Core i5-10400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β€” 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM67 (Core i5-2515E) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

FeatureCore i5-2515ECore i5-10400F
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2666+100%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2515E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Core i5-2515E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2515E targets Embedded, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-2515E rivals Embedded R-Series; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-2515ECore i5-10400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
β€”
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Embedded
Gaming
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-2515E was priced at $0, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($0 vs $160), Core i5-2515E was $160 cheaper.

FeatureCore i5-2515ECore i5-10400F
MSRP
$0-100%
$160
Performance per Dollar
β€”
81.4
Release Date
2011
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.