
Core i5-2515E

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2515E
2011Why buy it
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,882 vs 13,029).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +291.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-2515E.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i5-2515E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-2515E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i5-2515E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2515E vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2515E
The Core i5-2515E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,882 points. Launch price was $266.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2515E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core i5-2515E versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F β a 52.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-2515E uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020β2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2515E scores 1,882 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 β a 149.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 530 vs 1,454, a 93.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2515E vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Core i5-2515E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+72% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | Comet Lake (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 1,882 | 13,029+592% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 530 | 1,454+174% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2515E uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2515E versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F β the Core i5-10400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM67 (Core i5-2515E) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Core i5-2515E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2666+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2515E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Core i5-2515E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2515E targets Embedded, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-2515E rivals Embedded R-Series; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-2515E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 3000 | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Embedded | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-2515E was priced at $0, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($0 vs $160), Core i5-2515E was $160 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-2515E | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | β | 81.4 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














