
Core i5-2540M vs Athlon II X4 645

Core i5-2540M

Athlon II X4 645
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2540M is positioned at rank 8 and the Athlon II X4 645 is on rank 819, so the Core i5-2540M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2540M
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 645
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-2540M | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-2540M | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+98%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2540M and Athlon II X4 645

Core i5-2540M
The Core i5-2540M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $266.

Athlon II X4 645
The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2540M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X4 645 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2540M versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-2540M (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-2540M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2540M scores 2,356 against the Athlon II X4 645's 2,375 — a 0.8% lead for the Athlon II X4 645. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2540M vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 645.
| Feature | Core i5-2540M | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+6% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,356 | 2,375 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,374 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 399 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,374 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2540M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i5-2540M versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 645 — the Core i5-2540M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2540M) and AMD 700 Series,AMD 800 Series,AMD 900 Series (Athlon II X4 645).
| Feature | Core i5-2540M | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i5-2540M) vs Yes (Athlon II X4 645). The Core i5-2540M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon II X4 645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2540M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.
| Feature | Core i5-2540M | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-2540M launched at $266 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 645 debuted at $126. At current prices ($10 vs $20), the Core i5-2540M is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2540M delivers 235.6 pts/$ vs 118.8 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 645 — making the Core i5-2540M the 66% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2540M | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $266 | $126-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 235.6+98% | 118.8 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















