
Core i5-3230M

Core i5-750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-3230M is positioned at rank 30 and the Core i5-750 is on rank 960, so the Core i5-3230M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3230M
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-3230M | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($13) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-3230M | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+132%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($13) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3230M and Core i5-750

Core i5-3230M
The Core i5-3230M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,565 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i5-750
The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3230M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3230M versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i5-3230M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-750 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3230M scores 2,565 against the Core i5-750's 2,546 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-3230M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 565 vs 424, a 28.5% lead for the Core i5-3230M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3230M vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750.
| Feature | Core i5-3230M | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.66 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,565 | 2,546 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 565+33% | 424 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,128 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3230M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-750 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Core i5-3230M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM76,HM77 (Core i5-3230M) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750).
| Feature | Core i5-3230M | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3230M) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750). The Core i5-3230M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i5-750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3230M targets Gaming, Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3230M rivals Ryzen 5 3500U; Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.
| Feature | Core i5-3230M | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-3230M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Core i5-750 debuted at $210. At current prices ($13 vs $30), the Core i5-3230M is $17 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3230M delivers 197.3 pts/$ vs 84.9 pts/$ for the Core i5-750 — making the Core i5-3230M the 79.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3230M | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $210-7% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $13-57% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 197.3+132% | 84.9 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















