Core i5-3230M
VS
Pentium G4400

Core i5-3230M vs Pentium G4400

Intel

Core i5-3230M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium G4400

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-3230M is positioned at rank 30 and the Pentium G4400 is on rank 499, so the Core i5-3230M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3230M

#18
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
172%
#19
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
169%
#20
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
155%
#21
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
155%
#22
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
153%
#24
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
148%
#25
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
142%
#26
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
142%
#27
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
138%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
100%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
100%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
99%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
97%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
90%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
89%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G4400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7787%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7358%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5342%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1609%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1275%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1115%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
639%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
630%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
574%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
574%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
568%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
552%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
545%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
542%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
537%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
98%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
98%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
97%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
96%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
100%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
99%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
97%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G4400 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-3230M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-3230MPentium G4400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($13)
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-3230M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 85% cheaper ($13 vs $85) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-3230MPentium G4400
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+555%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($13)
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3230M and Pentium G4400

Intel

Core i5-3230M

The Core i5-3230M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,565 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Pentium G4400

The Pentium G4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,562 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3230M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G4400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3230M versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium G4400 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G4400 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-3230M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium G4400 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3230M scores 2,565 against the Pentium G4400's 2,562 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-3230M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3230M vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400.

FeatureCore i5-3230MPentium G4400
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,565
2,562
Geekbench 6 Single
565
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,128
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3230M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3230MPentium G4400
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3230M) / not specified (Pentium G4400). The Core i5-3230M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Pentium G4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3230M targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-3230M rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeatureCore i5-3230MPentium G4400
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-3230M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Pentium G4400 debuted at $64. At current prices ($13 vs $85), the Core i5-3230M is $72 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3230M delivers 197.3 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400 — making the Core i5-3230M the 147% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-3230MPentium G4400
MSRP
$225
$64-72%
Avg Price (30d)
$13-85%
$85
Performance per Dollar
197.3+555%
30.1
Release Date
2013
2015