
Core i5-3230M

Pentium G4400
Core i5-3230M vs Pentium G4400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3230M vs Pentium G4400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3230M vs Pentium G4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3230M
2013Why buy it
- β +0.1% higher PassMark.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Pentium G4400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 40.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- β848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
Pentium G4400
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $161 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β Delivers 251.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.0 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,562 vs 2,565).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-3230M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G4400 better than Core i5-3230M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3230M vs Pentium G4400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3230M
The Core i5-3230M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,565 points. Launch price was $225.

Pentium G4400
The Pentium G4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015β2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,562 points. Launch price was $64.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3230M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G4400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3230M versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium G4400 β a 3.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G4400 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-3230M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium G4400 uses Skylake (2015β2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3230M scores 2,565 against the Pentium G4400's 2,562 β a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-3230M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3230M vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400.
| Feature | Core i5-3230M | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) | Skylake (2015β2016) |
| PassMark | 2,565 | 2,562 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 565 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,128 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3230M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3230M | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3230M) / not specified (Pentium G4400). The Core i5-3230M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Pentium G4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3230M targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-3230M rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i5-3230M | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3230M was priced at $225, while the Pentium G4400 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($225 vs $64), Pentium G4400 was $161 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3230M delivers 11.4 pts/$ vs 40.0 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400 β making the Pentium G4400 the 111.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3230M | Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $64-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4 | 40.0+251% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














