Core i5-3320M
VS
Core i5-4288U

Core i5-3320M vs Core i5-4288U

Intel

Core i5-3320M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-4288U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-3320M is positioned at rank 65 and the Core i5-4288U is on rank 1135, so the Core i5-3320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3320M

#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#53
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
221%
#54
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
217%
#55
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
200%
#56
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
199%
#57
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
197%
#59
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
190%
#60
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
182%
#61
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
182%
#62
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
177%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
99%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
97%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
94%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4288U

#1123
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3776%
#1124
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3721%
#1125
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3416%
#1126
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3400%
#1127
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3369%
#1129
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3254%
#1130
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3120%
#1131
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3115%
#1132
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3031%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
100%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
99%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
98%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
97%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-3320M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-4288U in both compute-intensive tasks (0% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-3320MCore i5-4288U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($225)
⚠️ Higher cost ($342)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-3320M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 34% cheaper ($225 vs $342) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-3320MCore i5-4288U
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+52%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($225)
⚠️ Higher cost ($342)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3320M and Core i5-4288U

Intel

Core i5-3320M

The Core i5-3320M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,660 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Core i5-4288U

The Core i5-4288U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $342.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-3320M and Core i5-4288U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3320M versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4288U — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-3320M (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-3320M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4288U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3320M scores 2,660 against the Core i5-4288U's 2,659 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-3320M. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-3320MCore i5-4288U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+6%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,660
2,659
Geekbench 6 Single
880
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3320M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4288U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i5-3320M versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i5-4288U — the Core i5-4288U supports 180.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3320M supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-3320M) vs 12 (Core i5-4288U) — the Core i5-3320M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3320M) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i5-4288U).

FeatureCore i5-3320MCore i5-4288U
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+53233%
DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
32
16 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3320M) and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 (Core i5-4288U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4288U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-3320M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

FeatureCore i5-3320MCore i5-4288U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-3320M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Core i5-4288U debuted at $342.

FeatureCore i5-3320MCore i5-4288U
MSRP
$225-34%
$342
Release Date
2012
2013