Core i5-760 vs Core i5-3320M

Intel

Core i5-760

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-3320M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-760 vs Core i5-3320M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-760 vs Core i5-3320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-760 vs Core i5-3320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-760

2010

Why buy it

  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-3320M.

Trade-offs

  • 2.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $230 MSRPvs$225 MSRP
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3320M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-3320M

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $5 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core i5-760 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,660 vs 2,667).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-760.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-760 better than Core i5-3320M?
Yes. Core i5-760 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-760 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-760 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-760 comes in 2.2% more expensive on MSRP at $230 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3320M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 2.0% better value on paper (11.8 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3320M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-760 vs Core i5-3320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

Intel

Core i5-3320M

The Core i5-3320M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,660 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core i5-760 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3320M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-760 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3320M — a 0.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-760 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-3320M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-760 scores 2,667 against the Core i5-3320M's 2,660 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-760. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-760 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3320M.

FeatureCore i5-760Core i5-3320M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.33 GHz
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+8%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+167%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,667
2,660
Geekbench 6 Single
470
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-760 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3320M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-760 versus 1600 on the Core i5-3320M — the Core i5-3320M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3320M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-760) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3320M).

FeatureCore i5-760Core i5-3320M
Socket
LGA1156
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760) vs true (Core i5-3320M). The Core i5-3320M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i5-760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970; Core i5-3320M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

FeatureCore i5-760Core i5-3320M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-760 was priced at $230, while the Core i5-3320M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($230 vs $225), Core i5-3320M was $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-760 delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-3320M — making the Core i5-3320M the 1.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-760Core i5-3320M
MSRP
$230
$225-2%
Performance per Dollar
11.6
11.8+2%
Release Date
2010
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.