Core i5-760 vs Xeon E5607

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-760 vs Xeon E5607 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-760 vs Xeon E5607: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-760

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5607.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,667 vs 2,686).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Xeon E5607

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($135 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-760.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5607 better than Core i5-760?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5607 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-760 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5607 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5607 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5607 comes in $95 cheaper on MSRP at $135 MSRP versus $230 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-760 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 71.6% better value on MSRP (19.9 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5607 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-760 vs Xeon E5607 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

Xeon E5607

The Xeon E5607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,686 points. Launch price was $135.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-760 and Xeon E5607 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5607 — a 170% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Core i5-760 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5607 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-760 scores 2,667 against the Xeon E5607's 2,686 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5607. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-760	Xeon E5607
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.33 GHz+1133%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+24%	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,667	2,686
Geekbench 6 Single	470	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-760 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5607 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-760	Xeon E5607
Socket	LGA1156	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760) / not specified (Xeon E5607). Primary use case: Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.

Feature	Core i5-760	Xeon E5607
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-760 was priced at $230, while the Xeon E5607 came in at $135. On launch pricing ($230 vs $135), Xeon E5607 was $95 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-760 delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5607 — making the Xeon E5607 the 52.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-760	Xeon E5607
MSRP	$230	$135-41%
Performance per Dollar	11.6	19.9+72%
Release Date	2010	2011

Search Core i5-760 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5607 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.