
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-760

Celeron G5900

Core i5-760
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5900
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-760
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($42) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($61) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+46%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($42) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($61) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G5900 and Core i5-760

Celeron G5900
The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-760
The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.
Processing Power
The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-760 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-760 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G5900 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-760 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Core i5-760's 2,667 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G5900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 470, a 57.6% lead for the Celeron G5900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-760.
| Feature | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+2% | 3.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+21% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,682 | 2,667 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850+81% | 470 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-760 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-760 — the Celeron G5900 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-760).
| Feature | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5900) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760). The Celeron G5900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget, Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400; Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.
| Feature | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G5900 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Core i5-760 debuted at $230. At current prices ($42 vs $61), the Celeron G5900 is $19 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5900 delivers 63.9 pts/$ vs 43.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-760 — making the Celeron G5900 the 37.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-78% | $230 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $42-31% | $61 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.9+46% | 43.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















