PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
✅Delivers 362.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.6 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
✅Draws 58W instead of 95W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i5-760 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-760.

Core i5-760

2010

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G5900.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G5900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,667 vs 2,682).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 53.6 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌63.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 58W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5900 better than Core i5-760?

Yes. Celeron G5900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5900 comes in $180 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $230 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 362.6% better value on MSRP (53.6 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-760 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-760 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G5900 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-760 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Core i5-760's 2,667 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G5900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 470, a 57.6% lead for the Celeron G5900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-760.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core i5-760
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+2%	3.33 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,682	2,667
Geekbench 6 Single	850+81%	470
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-760 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-760 — the Celeron G5900 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-760).

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core i5-760
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+100%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+700%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5900) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760). The Celeron G5900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget, Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400; Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core i5-760
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Legacy Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5900 was priced at $50, while the Core i5-760 came in at $230. On launch pricing ($50 vs $230), Celeron G5900 was $180 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5900 delivers 53.6 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-760 — making the Celeron G5900 the 128.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core i5-760
MSRP	$50-78%	$230
Performance per Dollar	53.6+362%	11.6
Release Date	2020	2010

Search Celeron G5900 on Amazon

Search Core i5-760 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.