Celeron G5900 vs Celeron J4115

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900 vs Celeron J4115 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900 vs Celeron J4115: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,682 vs 2,688).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Celeron J4115 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1350% higher power demand at 58W vs 4W.

Celeron J4115

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 4W instead of 58W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5900 better than Celeron J4115?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G5900 is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4115 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Celeron J4115 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4115 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron J4115 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5900 vs Celeron J4115 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J4115 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G5900 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron J4115 uses Gemini Lake (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Celeron J4115's 2,688 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron J4115. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900 vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4115.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Celeron J4115
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+36%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+89%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Gemini Lake (2019)
PassMark	2,682	2,688
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4115 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900 versus 2400 on the Celeron J4115 — the Celeron G5900 supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5900) vs 6 (Celeron J4115) — the Celeron G5900 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4115).

Feature	Celeron G5900	Celeron J4115
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+11%	2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+1500%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5900) vs true (Celeron J4115). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5900) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4115) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400; Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.