Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-3340M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-3340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-3340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 58W instead of 512W, a 454W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,682 vs 2,692).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Core i5-3340M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-3340M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌782.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 58W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3340M better than Celeron G5900?

Yes. Core i5-3340M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3340M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3340M is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i5-3340M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5900 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,682 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-3340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3340M

The Core i5-3340M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3340M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-3340M — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-3340M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Core i5-3340M's 2,692 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-3340M. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3340M.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core i5-3340M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+26%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,682	2,692
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3340M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900 versus DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 on the Core i5-3340M — the Celeron G5900 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900) and HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3340M).

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core i5-3340M
Socket	LGA1200	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+100%	DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+300%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5900) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-3340M). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5900) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3340M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget, Core i5-3340M targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400; Core i5-3340M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core i5-3340M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	Budget	Professional Laptop