PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4950 vs Celeron G5900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4950 vs Celeron G5900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4950

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 58W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (672 vs 850).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,229 vs 1,600).
❌
4% HIGHER MSRP
$52 MSRPvs$50 MSRP

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

✅+26.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5900 better than Celeron G4950?

Yes. Celeron G5900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 30.2% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 30.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5900 comes in $2 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.8% better value on MSRP (53.6 vs 52.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4950 vs Celeron G5900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G4950 and Celeron G5900 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 versus 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 — a 3% clock advantage for the Celeron G5900 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron G4950 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G5900 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4950 scores 2,714 against the Celeron G5900's 2,682 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron G4950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 672 vs 850, a 23.4% lead for the Celeron G5900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,229 vs 1,600 (26.2% advantage for the Celeron G5900). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4950 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Celeron G5900
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	2,714+1%	2,682
Geekbench 6 Single	672	850+26%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	1,600+30%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5900 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4950 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900 — the Celeron G5900 supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4950) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900).

Feature	Celeron G4950	Celeron G5900
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2666+11%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4950) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget, Celeron G5900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420; Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Celeron G5900
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4950 was priced at $52, while the Celeron G5900 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($52 vs $50), Celeron G5900 was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4950 delivers 52.2 pts/$ vs 53.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G5900 — making the Celeron G5900 the 2.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Celeron G5900
MSRP	$52	$50-4%
Performance per Dollar	52.2	53.6+3%
Release Date	2019	2020

Search Celeron G4950 on Amazon

Search Celeron G5900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.