Celeron G4950 vs Opteron 3350 HE

Intel

Celeron G4950

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Opteron 3350 HE

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Celeron G4950 vs Opteron 3350 HE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4950 vs Opteron 3350 HE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4950 vs Opteron 3350 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4950

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.6% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Opteron 3350 HE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3350 HE, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Opteron 3350 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌20% higher power demand at 54W vs 45W.

Opteron 3350 HE

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
  • βœ…Draws 45W instead of 54W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (2,699 vs 2,714).
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4950 better than Opteron 3350 HE?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3350 HE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G4950 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G4950 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4950 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $52 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 3350 HE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4950 vs Opteron 3350 HE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

AMD

Opteron 3350 HE

The Opteron 3350 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,699 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

The Celeron G4950 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 3350 HE offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the Opteron 3350 HE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 3350 HE β€” a 14.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 3350 HE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron G4950 uses the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3350 HE uses Delhi (2012βˆ’2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4950 scores 2,714 against the Opteron 3350 HE's 2,699 β€” a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G4950. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4950 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3350 HE.

FeatureCeleron G4950Opteron 3350 HE
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+15%
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+18%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
8192 kB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
512 kB
4096 kB+700%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019)
Delhi (2012βˆ’2013)
PassMark
2,714
2,699
Geekbench 6 Single
672
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,229
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3350 HE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G4950Opteron 3350 HE
Socket
LGA1151
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
Yes
β€”
PCIe Lanes
16
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4950) / not specified (Opteron 3350 HE). The Celeron G4950 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Opteron 3350 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.

FeatureCeleron G4950Opteron 3350 HE
Integrated GPU
Yes
β€”
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
VT-x
β€”
Target Use
Budget
β€”