Celeron G4950 vs FX-4130

Celeron G4950 vs FX-4130 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G4950

2 / 2

2,714

0.0%

2,718

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4950 vs FX-4130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4950 vs FX-4130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4950

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $48 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.2 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 125W, a 71W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while FX-4130 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4130 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,714 vs 2,718).

FX-4130

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.2 vs 52.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
❌131.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4130 better than Celeron G4950?

Yes. FX-4130 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-4130 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4130 is still the better call for a fresh build. FX-4130 comes in 92.3% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4950 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,714 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4950 vs FX-4130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

FX-4130

The FX-4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,718 points. Launch price was $112.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4950 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-4130 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4130 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-4130 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the FX-4130 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Celeron G4950 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4950 scores 2,714 against the FX-4130's 2,718 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-4130.

Feature	Celeron G4950	FX-4130
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.9 GHz+18%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.8 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	4096 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	2,714	2,718
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4950	FX-4130
Socket	LGA1151	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4950) / not specified (FX-4130). The Celeron G4950 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the FX-4130 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.

Feature	Celeron G4950	FX-4130
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4950 was priced at $52, while the FX-4130 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($52 vs $100), Celeron G4950 was $48 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4950 delivers 52.2 pts/$ vs 27.2 pts/$ for the FX-4130 — making the Celeron G4950 the 63% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4950	FX-4130
MSRP	$52-48%	$100
Performance per Dollar	52.2+92%	27.2
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Celeron G4950 on Amazon

Search FX-4130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.