
Celeron G4950

Xeon E5-2603 v2
Celeron G4950 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G4950 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G4950 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G4950
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 80W, a 26W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon E5-2603 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2603 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,714 vs 2,735).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2603 v2, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2603 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2603 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌48.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 54W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2603 v2 better than Celeron G4950?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4950 vs Xeon E5-2603 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4950
The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

Xeon E5-2603 v2
The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,735 points. Launch price was $240.
Processing Power
The Celeron G4950 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2603 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v2 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G4950 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron G4950 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4950 scores 2,714 against the Xeon E5-2603 v2's 2,735 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2603 v2. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4950 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603 v2.
| Feature | Celeron G4950 | Xeon E5-2603 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+83% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+83% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 10 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 2,714 | 2,735 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 672 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,229 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G4950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G4950 | Xeon E5-2603 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4950) / not specified (Xeon E5-2603 v2). The Celeron G4950 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.
| Feature | Celeron G4950 | Xeon E5-2603 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













