Celeron G4950 vs Core i7-4600U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4950 vs Core i7-4600U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4950 vs Core i7-4600U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4950

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i7-4600U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,714 vs 2,720).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Core i7-4600U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-4600U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4600U better than Celeron G4950?

Yes. Core i7-4600U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4600U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4600U is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-4600U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4950 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,714 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4950 vs Core i7-4600U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i7-4600U

The Core i7-4600U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,720 points. Launch price was $398.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4950 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-4600U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4600U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron G4950 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4600U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4950 scores 2,714 against the Core i7-4600U's 2,720 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4600U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4950 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600U.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Core i7-4600U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+57%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Haswell-ULT (2013)
PassMark	2,714	2,720
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4600U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Core i7-4600U
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4950) / not specified (Core i7-4600U). The Celeron G4950 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i7-4600U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.