Celeron G4950 vs Core m3-7Y32

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4950 vs Core m3-7Y32 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4950 vs Core m3-7Y32: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4950

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 443.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.2 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core m3-7Y32 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌1100% higher power demand at 54W vs 4.5W.

Core m3-7Y32

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 54W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4950 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,697 vs 2,714).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 52.2 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4950 better than Core m3-7Y32?

Yes. Celeron G4950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4950 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4950 comes in $229 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 443.8% better value on MSRP (52.2 vs 9.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4950 vs Core m3-7Y32 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4950 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-7Y32's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 versus 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G4950 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron G4950 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4950 scores 2,714 against the Core m3-7Y32's 2,697 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G4950. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4950 vs 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y32.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Core m3-7Y32
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+200%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,714	2,697
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Core m3-7Y32
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4950) / not specified (Core m3-7Y32). The Celeron G4950 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core m3-7Y32 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Core m3-7Y32
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4950 was priced at $52, while the Core m3-7Y32 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($52 vs $281), Celeron G4950 was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4950 delivers 52.2 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Core m3-7Y32 — making the Celeron G4950 the 137.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4950	Core m3-7Y32
MSRP	$52-81%	$281
Performance per Dollar	52.2+444%	9.6
Release Date	2019	2017

Search Celeron G4950 on Amazon

Search Core m3-7Y32 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.