Celeron G5900 vs Core m3-7Y32

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900 vs Core m3-7Y32 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900 vs Core m3-7Y32: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 458.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.6 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core m3-7Y32 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,682 vs 2,697).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌1188.9% higher power demand at 58W vs 4.5W.

Core m3-7Y32

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 58W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G5900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 53.6 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5900 better than Core m3-7Y32?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G5900 is ahead with a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y32 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core m3-7Y32 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y32 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5900 comes in $231 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core m3-7Y32 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 458.9% better value on MSRP (53.6 vs 9.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5900 vs Core m3-7Y32 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-7Y32's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G5900 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Core m3-7Y32's 2,697 — a 0.6% lead for the Core m3-7Y32. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900 vs 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y32.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core m3-7Y32
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+209%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,682	2,697
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y32 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core m3-7Y32
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5900) / not specified (Core m3-7Y32). The Celeron G5900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core m3-7Y32 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core m3-7Y32
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5900 was priced at $50, while the Core m3-7Y32 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($50 vs $281), Celeron G5900 was $231 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5900 delivers 53.6 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Core m3-7Y32 — making the Celeron G5900 the 139.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Core m3-7Y32
MSRP	$50-82%	$281
Performance per Dollar	53.6+458%	9.6
Release Date	2020	2017

Search Celeron G5900 on Amazon

Search Core m3-7Y32 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.