Celeron G5900 vs PRO A12-9800B

Celeron G5900 vs PRO A12-9800B Performance Spectrum

Celeron G5900

2 / 2

2,682

0.0%

2,705

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900 vs PRO A12-9800B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900 vs PRO A12-9800B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while PRO A12-9800B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,682 vs 2,705).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while PRO A12-9800B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2800% higher power demand at 58W vs 2W.

PRO A12-9800B

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 58W, a 56W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A12-9800B better than Celeron G5900?

Yes. PRO A12-9800B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A12-9800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A12-9800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A12-9800B is still the better call for a fresh build. PRO A12-9800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5900 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,682 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5900 vs PRO A12-9800B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A12-9800B

The PRO A12-9800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,705 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the PRO A12-9800B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-9800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 3.6 GHz on the PRO A12-9800B — a 5.7% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800B (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A12-9800B uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the PRO A12-9800B's 2,705 — a 0.9% lead for the PRO A12-9800B.

Feature	Celeron G5900	PRO A12-9800B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+26%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,682	2,705
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A12-9800B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5900	PRO A12-9800B
Socket	LGA1200	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5900) / not specified (PRO A12-9800B). The Celeron G5900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the PRO A12-9800B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400.