Celeron G5900 vs Opteron 3350 HE

Celeron G5900 vs Opteron 3350 HE Performance Spectrum

Celeron G5900

2 / 2

2,682

0.0%

2,699

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900 vs Opteron 3350 HE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900 vs Opteron 3350 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Opteron 3350 HE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,682 vs 2,699).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3350 HE, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Opteron 3350 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌28.9% higher power demand at 58W vs 45W.

Opteron 3350 HE

2012

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 45W instead of 58W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3350 HE better than Celeron G5900?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3350 HE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G5900 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 3350 HE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3350 HE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 3350 HE is still the better call for a fresh build. Opteron 3350 HE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5900 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,682 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5900 vs Opteron 3350 HE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 3350 HE

The Opteron 3350 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,699 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 3350 HE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3350 HE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 3350 HE — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 3350 HE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3350 HE uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Opteron 3350 HE's 2,699 — a 0.6% lead for the Opteron 3350 HE. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3350 HE.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Opteron 3350 HE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,682	2,699
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3350 HE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5900	Opteron 3350 HE
Socket	LGA1200	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5900) / not specified (Opteron 3350 HE). The Celeron G5900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Opteron 3350 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400.